HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US February 6, 2012
DUI
             
 
Selecting a dui attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

DUI Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

Armed Services Committee Improves Veterans Survivor Benefit Plan

Survivor Benefits Legislation Added to Defense Bill, Eliminates “Widow’s Tax” 
  
 WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Jim Saxton (NJ-3rd), whose Third Congressional District has the most veterans in New Jersey, today hailed reforms of the Survivor Benefit Plan, (SBP) the annuity plan for survivors of military retirees. The provisions passed the House Armed Services Committee last night.

“Service members and survivors who signed up for the program will finally see some significant improvements to the SBP,” said Saxton. “We worked on this late into the evening and came up with the one of the most significant program improvements in the history of the SBP.”

The House Armed Services Committee approved eliminating the Social Security offset under the SBP by increasing the annuities paid to survivors of military retirees who are 62 or older. The SBP provision was included in H.R. 4200, the Fiscal Year 2005 National Defense Authorization Act, which was passed by the Committee late last evening.

There are approximately 43,000 veterans in Burlington County, 59,000 in Ocean County and 40,000 in Camden County.

“We pushed for its inclusion in the 2005 Defense Authorization Act,” Saxton said. “It appears that we finally will fix the major inequity of the Survivor Benefit Plan.”

Lee Lange, Deputy Director of Government Relations at the Military Officers Association of America, praised the House for acting to right a longstanding unfairness, calling it “a major development.”

”This is truly a remarkable turn of events,” Lange said. “We are stunned and we couldn’t be more pleased.”

The SBP, established in 1972, provides a monthly income to the surviving spouse of a military retiree who chooses to participate. The retiree accepts reduced retired pay in exchange for an annuity that would benefit the surviving spouse upon the retiree’s death. Currently the surviving spouse would receive 55% of the deceased’s retired pay until age 62 when the spouse would receive 35 percent due to the Social Security offset.

Many of these survivors were never told about this annuity cut and the unexpected loss of income can be financially devastating. The 20 percent reduction does not match what was promised and provided to survivors of other federal retirees.

Restoring equity requires an increase in the SBP annuity. The legislation would eliminate the Social Security offset under SBP and increase the annuities paid to survivors of military retirees who are 62 or older from 35 percent of retired pay to the percentages indicated for the following periods:

• (1)        For months after September 2005 and before April 2006:  40 percent
• (2)        For months after March 2006 and before April 2007:  45 percent
• (3)        For months after March 2007 and before April 2008:  50 percent
• (4)        For months after March 2008: 55 percent

Restoring SBP equity over this period will cost approximately $2 billion. The bill, H.R. 4200, will head to the House floor next week.

Saxton has worked for years to improve SBP. In 1998, Saxton cosponsored a bill H.R. 3107, which was incorporated in the 1999 National Defense Authorization Act and signed into law. As passed, participants who have been enrolled in the SBP for 30 years and have reached the age of 70 can enter a “paid-up” status, whereby they would stop paying further SBP premiums and continue to receive SBP benefits for their survivors in the event of their death. The effective date of this provision, however, is delayed until October 1, 2008.  Saxton then introduced an SBP reform bill in 2003, H.R. 1653, to rectify the delayed effective date.  Currently, this bill has garnered 48 cosponsors.


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  • DUI Laws
  • DWI
  • Speeding
  • Breathalyzer Exams
  • Manslaughter
  • Drunk Driving Defense
  • Blood Alcohol Content
  • Controlled Substance Abuse
  Did You Know?
 

No Safe Amount of Alcohol for Drivers

While there is no “safe” amount of alcohol for drivers to consume, most people can drink moderately and drive legally when they reach the legal limit of .08 BAC. A 170-pound male typically would have to consume more than four drinks in one hour on an empty stomach to reach a BAC of .08. A 135-pound female typically would have to consume three drinks in the same time frame.


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on DUI Law Firms.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.